In principle, employees are clearly privileged in their liability towards the employer compared to the normal principles of law of obligations. The legislator assumes that a corresponding privileging of the employee is appropriate because the employer basically bears the business risk. The risks associated with the organisation of his business are therefore in principle imposed on him.
In principle, all employees of the enterprise, the trainees and, as a rule, also the borrowed temporary workers can invoke the corresponding liability privileges. In contrast, freelancers who are not personally dependent on the employer do not generally enjoy a corresponding liability privilege. The regulations on employee liability represent mandatory employee protection law. In this respect, it is not possible to deviate from these regulations at the expense of the employee within the framework of the employment contract or even a collective bargaining agreement.
Employee liability and the three-step theory
If damage has occurred in the company which has been caused by an employee, the question of his liability towards the employer is governed by the so-called three-step theory. This theory assumes that the employee is not obliged to pay damages in case of slight negligence. In the case of normal or medium negligence, the damage caused is usually divided proportionally between the employee and the employer, taking into account the overall circumstances. Only if the employee can be accused of gross negligence or intent will he or she have to bear the total damage under certain circumstances.
The decisive factor for employee liability is therefore always an overall assessment of the individual case. In order to determine the employee’s share of liability, five essential factors are always taken into account. The following points are decisive:
- The degree of fault (slight negligence, medium negligence, gross negligence or intent)
- The amount of the damage incurred
- The amount of the employee’s remuneration
- The hazardous nature of his activity
The question of whether the damage involves a risk calculated by the employer or covered by insurance.
In addition, the courts usually also take into account the employee’s personal circumstances, such as his or her age, family circumstances or length of service.
Within the scope of the burden of proof, it is incumbent on the employer to present and prove the employee’s breach of duty, the extent of his or her fault and the damage actually incurred. If, on the other hand, the employee wishes to invoke the conditions of limited employee liability, he must also prove in the event of a dispute that the damage was caused in the course of an activity initiated by him in his business.
more about labour law: Labour law in hospitals – Labour law in the pharmaceutical industry – Labour law in the care of the elderl – Labour law in the railway sector – Labour law cases– Labour law and corona
Remember that!
As employment law cases should be solved quickly, we always have an initial consultation appointment immediately. If possible on the same day, otherwise the next day. Please write us a message or call us directly. You can reach us by phone from Mo-Fr in the time from 8 am to 6pm.
Also interesting:
Duration of entitlement to unemployment benefit
The legislator has changed the period of entitlement to unemployment benefit by the third law for modern services on the labour market (Hartz III). However, due to the transitional provision in § 434 l SGB III, the change will not take effect until 01.02.2006. For employees/unemployed persons whose entitlement to unemployment benefit arises up to 31.1.2006, i.e. the unemployment must be present at the latest by 31.01.2006, § 127 SGB III in the version valid up to 31.12.2003 is to be further applied. The new version, which has been a law since 01.01.2004, therefore applies for the first time to terminations of employment relationships that were pronounced on 31.01.2006. READ OTHER
Up to 32 months of unemployment benefit under the old law
Professionals in protection against dismissal : Lawyer for dismissal protection in Hamburg – Lawyer for dismissal protection in Neumünster – Lawyer for dismissal protection in Rotherbaum– Lawyer for dismissal protection in St. Georg – Labour law office in Altona – Labour law office in Bergedorf – Labour law office in Dulsberg – Labour law office in Kiel
Remember that!
As employment law cases should be solved quickly, we always have an initial consultation appointment immediately. If possible on the same day, otherwise the next day. Please write us a message or call us directly. You can reach us by phone from Mo-Fr in the time from 8 am to 6pm.